Phillip Thomas Tucker's has written a well researched, very readable book titled "Barksdale's Charge: The True High Tide of the Confederacy at Gettysburg, July 2, 1863".
Dr. Tucker's book makes the premise that at the Battle of Gettysburg General Barksdale's charge is more significant that General Picket's charge. The author presents detail after detail.
The book gives a wonderful history of the Mississippi Brigade. He points out they are tall, straight shooters, and brave. I found the book redundant at points.
The author makes good arguments for Barksdale's charge being more important than Pickett's. If Barksdale had lived and expended the same energy that Pickett did in defending his actions, we think more highly of his Mississippi brigade's contributions. Interestingly, the point of view presented was almost exclusively southern apologetic.
The book was an enjoyable read. The history of the Mississippi brigade and its contributions is worth the purchase price. I think the historians have already decided Pickett charge was more important than Barksdale's, but it made me reevaluate.
I am well read on the subject of Gettysburg having read more than twenty books and memoirs on the battle. I am a trained historian by education who studied military history. I am a former US Army infantry officer who has studied the battle in detail in my military science curriculum. All this said; I can examine the premise, but respectfully disagree with it.